top of page
Search

When the System Builds Itself 1/3

  • Writer: Claas
    Claas
  • Jul 3
  • 3 min read

Part 1: From input to infrastructure, how enterprise software is learning to build itself


For decades, enterprise software has been built through human labor. Analysts gather requirements, architects draw flows, developers configure or code, testers validate what was interpreted, and project managers keep progress on track while navigating constant uncertainty. We have come to accept this as normal, even necessary. But that might not be true much longer.

The way we implement enterprise software is about to change. Not gradually, but fundamentally. And this change will not be driven by a new methodology or a clever delivery model. It will be driven by something much more disruptive. The software will start to build itself.

This is not a future fantasy. It has already begun. And it is not about automation in the traditional sense. It is about agency.

From co-pilot to creator


For past few years, vendors have talked about AI as a co-pilot. Tools like Salesforce Einstein Copilot, Microsoft Copilot, and SAP Joule already parse natural language, surface insights, and automate repetitive tasks. But look closely, and you can see where this is headed. These systems are not just helping people use software more efficiently. They are learning how to become the software.

You no longer need to file a ticket or launch a project to request a new approval flow. You
can describe it, and the system builds it. You do not need to document a report specification. You explain what you need, and the system generates the logic, the filters, and the layout.

This is not configuration. It is real-time generation of system behavior based on business intent.

Imagine saying, "I want a sales workflow that qualifies leads by source, flags inactivity after 14 days, and alerts the regional manager if thresholds are missed." The system understands the request, interprets it using its internal data model, and creates the objects, logic, and interface without human intervention. What used to take weeks now happens in minutes. No Jira tickets, no workshops, no PowerPoint.

The disappearance of classic implementation


This new capability is emerging from the combination of three forces. First, enterprise platforms are becoming increasingly standardized and modular. Second, AI models now understand language well enough to capture intent, context, and business logic. Third, these systems are integrated deeply enough to act, not just advise.

Put this together, and you do not just get a smarter user experience. You get a system that configures itself.

At first, it will feel like magic. For users, it is empowering. For vendors, it is a leap forward in reducing friction. But for implementation partners and delivery organizations, this changes the game entirely.

The system does not wait for configuration anymore. It listens, learns, and acts. The AI does not just guide the user. It defines the system behavior, writes the logic, and proposes the architecture.

This is not the next iteration of low-code. This is the beginning of real no-code, not because people build faster, but because the system builds itself.

What happens next


We are not there yet, but we are closer than most realize. The natural language layer is maturing fast. Vendors are embedding generative capabilities directly into their core platforms. Pilot projects are already demonstrating how business users can ask for changes in plain English, and the platform responds with functional solutions.

If this continues, the idea of "requirements gathering" will look outdated. So will the long, expensive implementation cycles that surround most enterprise software today. And so will the traditional role of partners who define and deliver solutions by hand.
Of course, there will be challenges. Not every request will be clear. Not every configuration will be safe to automate. But the direction is clear. We are moving from a world where systems need to be told what to do, to one where they listen and adapt on their own.

The question is no longer whether this is possible. It is whether we are ready.

Outlook part 2/3


The shift toward self-building systems is not just a technological breakthrough, it’s a fundamental redefinition of how enterprise software is delivered. But if the system can now interpret intent and build itself, what happens to traditional delivery? What role remains for consultants, architects, and implementation partners? In Part 2, we explore how this transformation disrupts the delivery model — and in Part 3, we look ahead to where human expertise still matters, and what new roles are already beginning to emerge.
 
 
 

Comments

Rated 0 out of 5 stars.
No ratings yet

Add a rating
bottom of page