The Employee you haven’t hired yet: rethinking Digital Labor

Imagine a candidate who never gets tired, works continuously and learns faster than any onboarding program. They make no typing errors, forget nothing and deliver consistent quality without supervision. There are no payroll costs, vacation requests or burnout risks. Most leaders would want such an employee. You might have realized: they already exist.

Digital labor refers to software that performs work instead of merely supporting it. For a long time technology helped people execute tasks faster or with greater accuracy. Now intelligent systems are beginning to take on defined parts of the job themselves. They write, classify, verify and decide. The concept is not futuristic, it is already embedded in reporting, customer interaction and service delivery. What is missing is not capability but recognition: the awareness that this is no longer about software tools, but about work itself.

---

A concept that changed sides

The term digital labor has been around for more than a decade, though its meaning has shifted. Originally it described people performing work through digital platforms e.g. content moderation, data tagging, or other forms of human micro-work that powered algorithms. In recent years, the definition has reversed: digital systems are now performing work for people. Automation, AI copilots and autonomous agents are no longer tools at the edge of the process; they are participants in the process itself.

This change matters because the moment a system performs work, accountability and value creation must be reconsidered. Digital labor is not just improved technology. It represents a new form of workforce contribution. Yet most organizations still treat it as IT. They install automation, call it digital labor and measure results in system metrics such as uptime or ticket volume. True labor, however, is defined by the value it generates and by the way it is managed.

---

From cost efficiency to capability

Early business cases for digital labor focused on cost savings: doing the same work with fewer people. From my view that narrative is too narrow. The real advantage lies in what additional capacity, quality or speed can be achieved when digital labor augments human capability.

• Additional revenue: digital labor scales instantly, allowing more transactions, more customers and faster response without additional headcount.

• New services: some activities were too complex or expensive for people alone like continuous analysis, personalized recommendations or real-time reporting. With digital labor, these become feasible.

• Talent scarcity: in sectors with limited qualified personnel or high safety risks, digital labor maintains operations rather than replacing staff. It keeps the business running when human availability is constrained.

• Volatile or seasonal demand: digital labor can expand or contract within hours, providing operational flexibility that human hiring cycles cannot match.

• Entirely new businesses: when software can analyze, decide and act autonomously, it enables service models that previously did not exist.

In short, the strongest business cases for digital labor are not about reduction but about possibility. The ability to perform work that was once beyond reach.

---

A workforce without HR

Digital labor does not eliminate the need for management - it multiplies it. Without structure, organizations accumulate hundreds of small bots, scripts and AI helpers that operate independently. In human terms, that would be a supervision issue. The parallels between human and digital work are striking, yet most companies have not adapted their frameworks.

Human hire	Digital labor
Job description	Process definition
Recruitment and interview	Proof of concept and test run
Onboarding	Integration, access and training data
Supervisor	Process owner or business lead
Salary	License, infrastructure and maintenance
Performance review	Monitoring, evaluation, retraining
HR record	System registry and change log
Compliance check	Algorithmic audit and explainability review
Termination	Model retirement or decommissioning

In most enterprises, no single function owns this structure. HR does not view it as hiring, IT sees it as software and operations assume it will simply work. The result is ungoverned labor: productive but unmanaged, powerful but unaccountable.

Managing digital labor effectively means applying lessons long established in people management: clear roles, explicit ownership, performance criteria, and continuous learning. These principles remain unchanged and only the performers have evolved.

---

Governance and responsibility

As digital labor scales, the question shifts from feasibility to responsibility. Who supervises an algorithm’s output? Who ensures that an AI agent follows updated policy? Who reports when something goes wrong? These questions echo familiar management challenges, yet they are rarely addressed in automation programs.

Governance frameworks will need to expand beyond IT controls. They must combine the rigor of process management with the empathy of leadership. Digital labor cannot self-govern; it must be trained, monitored, and occasionally corrected. This is less about ethics in theory and more about operational reliability. The same accountability that defines any human role.

When systems begin to perform work autonomously, organizations rediscover management fundamentals: define boundaries, provide oversight, measure outcomes and adjust as conditions change. What used to apply to employees now applies equally to systems. Without this discipline, digital labor remains a set of disconnected initiatives rather than an integrated workforce.

---

The broader shift

Digital transformation once focused on tools, but the next stage focuses on who performs the work. The modern workforce now consists of employees, contractors, partners and intelligent systems capable of executing tasks independently. The organizations that progress fastest will be those that treat this hybrid composition as one integrated operating model. Success will depend less on how many digital agents are deployed and more on how effectively they are managed and aligned with business outcomes.

Digital labor is not about replacing people, but it broadens the definition of a team. Many organizations speak of a persistent talent shortage, yet part of the available capability already resides in the systems they use every day. The real shortage lies in recognizing and managing this new form of work. If a better employee were available (faster, consistent and tireless) most companies would want them on the team. The challenge now is to recognize that such an employee may not have a name, a desk, or a LinkedIn profile.